Dissecting the 'Party of God' By    Fred Burton and Reva Bhalla   While the world obsesses this week over whether the    ill-fated Annapolis conference will result in the ultimate Israeli-Palestinian    peace settlement, the real political drama is taking place in    Lebanon. In Beirut, Lebanese President Emile Lahoud, a renowned    Syrian stooge, has stepped down, creating a political vacuum large enough to    send the country back to its dark days of civil war. Hezbollah ("the Party of    God") stands in the middle of this political battle, aiming to expand its    power, ensure its long-term survival as a militant movement and serve    Damascus' interests in selecting Lebanon's new president. Hezbollah intends to    meet these objectives through force, and it already has plans to launch a    government takeover should the pro-Western government of Prime Minister Fouad    Siniora act unilaterally and appoint a president.       The standoff in Beirut plays into the larger interests of    Hezbollah's Syrian and Iranian patrons. Hezbollah was created by the Iranians    and has been nurtured by the Syrians since the early 1980s. Though Tehran and    Damascus have a deeply rooted strategic alliance, their interests often    collide when it comes to deciding how Hezbollah is utilized as a militant    proxy. So, while Iran wants Hezbollah to focus on the larger objective of    bolstering itself as a model Islamist movement capable of defending Shiite    interests in the wider region, Syria uses Hezbollah primarily to score    tactical gains in its "Godfather"-like political feuds in Beirut. At the same    time, Hezbollah is having its own difficulties selling the Lebanese public on    the idea that it is an independent, nationalist resistance movement, rather    than a simple pawn of the Iranians and Syrians. All of these factors put a    great deal of stress on the Hezbollah leadership, which has come under intense    pressure in recent months over how to handle the presidential crisis in    Lebanon while balancing these competing    interests.   At the end of the day, the Iranians have the most sway    over Hezbollah's actions. As believers (to varying degrees) in the Vilayat    al-Faqih concept, Hezbollah leaders largely see the group's relationship with    Iran as religiously sanctioned, and one that must be honored at all costs.    Iran keeps close tabs on the group's leaders and does not hesitate to make the    necessary adjustments when it feels its interests are being challenged. It    also does not hurt that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)    markets 75 percent of the Bekaa Valley's heroin, on which both Hezbollah and    Syria rely heavily for their finances.    The Hezbollah    Leadership   Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah is Hezbollah's secretary-general    and has been Hezbollah's most pragmatic and charismatic leader -- though his    stature has exceeded Iranian limits, and his accommodating attitude toward    Syria and Lebanese politics does not sit well with a number of mullahs in    Tehran. Therefore, given that many actors, including Israel, want Nasrallah    dead, Iran has jumped on that excuse to order him into hiding. As a result, he    no longer attends Hezbollah meetings and has limited his contact with the    party leadership and cadres. Needless to say, Nasrallah's influence over the    organization's decision-making process has waned considerably, raising    concerns about just how moderated Hezbollah's future actions will    be.   Imad Fayez Mugniyah, nicknamed "the Wolf," is Hezbollah's    strongman. He has alternately been described as the head of Hezbollah's    security apparatus, as the group's chief of intelligence and as its chief of    special operations. Mugniyah also has been described by sources as having one    foot in Hezbollah and the other in the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and    Security, indicating that his loyalty is to Tehran. He is credited with some    of Hezbollah's deadliest attacks and kidnappings of the 1980s, including the    April 1983 attack against the U.S. Embassy in Beirut, the October 1983 attack    against the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut and the June 1985 hijacking of TWA    Flight 847. After spending years in the shadows, Mugniyah, according to our    sources, has re-emerged in Beirut's southern suburbs, where he is busy    organizing cells of Shiite operatives from the Arab Gulf states to carry out    retaliatory attacks against U.S. interests and pro-U.S. Arab governments in    the event of war against Iran. With Mugniyah back in the game, Hezbollah once    again is capable of staging major attacks abroad, allowing Iran to raise    substantially the cost of a U.S. attack against the country. Mugniyah    coordinates with Hashim Abu Fares, Hezbollah's main official in Iran, who does    the group's dirty work by training and recruiting operatives for Iraq and for    reprisal attacks in the Gulf states.   Wafiq Safa is Hezbollah's head of security. Safa is one    of the founding members of the group and is highly trusted by the IRGC and    Nasrallah. Since Nasrallah no longer attends meetings, he depends primarily on    Safa for updates. Safa, who is a terse and paranoid leader, takes care of the    group's security arrangements, doing everything from arming Hezbollah allies    in Beirut to forging automobile license plates to sheltering Syrian agents in    the city's southern suburbs. Safa constantly coordinates with Mugniyah and    controls most of Hezbollah's centers in the Bekaa Valley. He is known to have    an extensive surveillance system throughout the Bekaa, with all incoming and    outgoing security reports passing through him.       Hussein Khalil takes the lead in shaping Hezbollah's    political position and activities, as well as communicating with local    political forces in Lebanon. He also acts as the group's primary liaison with    Syria. Khalil works in collaboration with Sheikh Naim Qasim, Hezbollah's    deputy secretary-general. Qasim is widely seen as a hard-liner in the    organization and is far more willing to carry out Iran's bidding than to    accommodate the Syrians, whom he deeply distrusts. His views toward Damascus    consistently put him at odds with Nasrallah.   The Iranian    Grip   Each of these key figures in the Hezbollah chain of    command is closely watched by Tehran. After all, Iran needs to convince its    adversaries in the region and in the West that it exerts control over its    militant proxies' decision-making processes. Iran's IRGC oversees practically    every aspect of Hezbollah's activities, and Hezbollah officials regularly    travel to Damascus to receive instructions from the Iranian Embassy there. In    addition to keeping Hezbollah close, Iran also expends a great deal of effort    keeping watch over Syria's military command. For example, it regularly sends    Iranian military delegations to Syria and gives Syrian officers intense    training in Tehran on operating and maintaining long-range missiles. In fact,    sources in the region report that Iran has significantly increased its control    over Syria's long-range military arsenal, including its missiles, at a    military base in the Shinshar area, south of the city of Homs.       This is particularly alarming news for anyone who has    gotten on Iran's bad side. Longtime Stratfor readers are aware that the summer    2006 conflict between Israel and Hezbollah resulted from an Iranian decision    to have Hezbollah launch an artillery rocket into Haifa and force Israel into    a full-blown conflict for which it was ill-prepared. With IRGC officers    literally in control of Hezbollah's military arsenal and holding sway over    Syrian military commanders, Iran's adversaries -- particularly Israel --    cannot be sure what provocations might be unleashed. It is a game of risk the    Iranians are not afraid to play, particularly as they seek to bolster their    leverage in negotiations with the United States over    Iraq.   Hezbollah's To-Do    List   With Iranian help, Hezbollah has wasted no time in    recovering from last year's conflict and is preparing for its next military    confrontation with Israel. For example, to form a special force, Hezbollah has    recruited hundreds of young Shiite operatives from across Lebanon and is    training them at Hezbollah centers around Wadi al-Nabi in the Bekaa Valley.    Each recruit is paid about $335 per month and is expected to report for combat    missions when called upon. Hezbollah also has been buying up Beirut apartments    left and right in order to secure its supply lines in the southern suburbs, in    the event of a showdown between its members and rival Lebanese factions.       Hezbollah is spending the bulk of its effort on    rebuilding its positions and communications systems in southern Lebanon, where    more than 13,000 U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) troops currently are    based. As we discussed after the conflict, the UNIFIL presence in the South    will not be an effective buffer between Israel and Hezbollah strongholds there    and in the Bekaa Valley. UNIFIL no longer does thorough searches for weapons    depots, and violations it reports to the Lebanese army -- which includes a    large number of Shia sympathetic to Hezbollah -- often are ignored. As a    result, Hezbollah has succeeded in building two large armored defense lines    north of the Litani River, which are critical to the group's strategy of    pulling Israel into a protracted guerrilla war in the Bekaa in the event of    another military confrontation. With UNIFIL troops just a few miles away,    Hezbollah even had the chutzpah to stage large military exercises Nov. 5 north    of the Litani. The maneuvers entailed Hezbollah fighters preparing missiles    for launching and mobilizing village fighters on short notice. Hezbollah also    was able to test the effectiveness of its communication systems between its    paramilitary units and command centers along the    river. Though Hezbollah does not view UNIFIL as a critical    threat to its operations, it still presents an obstacle that the group would    rather see removed. Hezbollah, along with its patrons in Damascus and Tehran,    remembers well that its attacks in 1983 drove U.S. and French forces out of    the country. Hezbollah, however, is not jumping the gun to attack UNIFIL    directly, as it is not yet ready to deal with the repercussions.       This is where    Syria comes in.   The Syrians, via their military intelligence, have an    artful way of transiting jihadists in and out of Syria -- operating a jihadist    supply chain of sorts. Some of these jihadists turn up in Iraq, but lately a    good number have turned up in Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon,    particularly the Ain al-Hilweh camp outside Sidon. Many of those recruited at    Ain al-Hilweh are coming from the now-defunct Fatah al-Islam movement. Their    mission is to undergo training for a military campaign against UNIFIL troops.    Two such attacks already have occurred -- a June car bombing that killed six    members of UNIFIL's Spanish battalion and a July attack against a U.N.    military police observation post involving the Tanzanian contingent. And this    is only the beginning.   With Hezbollah preparations in full steam and Lebanon    teetering on the brink of civil war, this theater is just waiting to explode.    The controller of the time bomb, however, likely is sitting in Tehran.       
 
28.12.07
...Donc, Michel Sleiman n'a aucune chance...
Chié à la va-vite par:
(...)
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
 
11 commentaires:
Ton post est trop long.
En plus, tu gardes la grande typo du site ou tu l'as copié.
Je ne pense pas que trop de lecteurs aient envie de lire jusqu'au bout.
La prochaine fois, poste le lien seulement.
Ou synthétise le texte et signe le (...).
Mais ca serait trop dur, vu que tu ecris comme un zizi.
i agree with anonyme..
lis le et tais toi.
hihi :)
Ca t'enerve de savoir que tu ecris comme un zizi?
Non, je ne m'énerve pas facilement...
Pourquoi, tu écris avec ton zizi toi?
au moins j'ecris.
c mieux que copy-paste, non?
...tant que tu ne reflechis pas avec ton zizi, oui oui c'est mieux...
euuuhhh
est-ce ke les niouzes est devenu un blog pornographique?
parceke mes parents ne me laiseront plus le lire :(((
vive le 3arak!
Vive Abou 3ammar!
juste a titre informatif, cette article est vraiment nul pour ceux qui veulent savoir deux trois trucs sur Hizbullah.
deuxio, qu'est ce que ca a avoir avec michel sleiman?
Enregistrer un commentaire